123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494 |
- relay interface (formerly relayfs)
- ==================================
- The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to
- efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel
- to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'.
- A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented
- as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each
- represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space. Kernel
- clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write
- functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel
- buffer. User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files
- and retrieve the data as it becomes available. The relay files
- themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and
- are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below.
- The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely
- up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide
- hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the
- buffer data. The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data
- filtering - this also is left to the kernel client. The purpose is to
- keep things as simple as possible.
- This document provides an overview of the relay interface API. The
- details of the function parameters are documented along with the
- functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details.
- Semantics
- =========
- Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more
- sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is
- too full to contain a new message, in which case it is written to
- the next (if available). Messages are never split across sub-buffers.
- At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first
- sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next.
- When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many
- bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete
- message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer. Userspace can use this
- knowledge to copy only valid data.
- After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer
- has been consumed.
- A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not
- yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed.
- The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such
- data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain
- simple and not impose a single interface on userspace. It does
- provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described
- below.
- The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the
- read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain
- the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and
- user isn't necessary for basic operation.
- One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low
- overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace. While the
- read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap()
- approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the
- two approaches as small as possible.
- klog and relay-apps example code
- ================================
- The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier,
- a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided.
- The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge
- site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a
- pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and
- kernel sides of a relay application. When combined these two sets of
- boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without
- having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores.
- The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps
- tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the
- kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel,
- regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even
- whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not. These
- functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere
- in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler'
- registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak
- examples for details).
- It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch,
- i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but
- you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel,
- allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of
- padding). The read() interface both removes padding and internally
- consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being
- used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication
- between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation. Things
- such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via
- some channel though.
- klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps
- tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
- The relay interface user space API
- ==================================
- The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space
- access to relay channel buffer data. Here are the file operations
- that are available and some comments regarding their behavior:
- open() enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer.
- mmap() results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's
- memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you
- must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE.
- read() read the contents of a channel buffer. The bytes read are
- 'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available
- again to subsequent reads. If the channel is being used
- in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any
- time even if there's an active kernel writer. If the
- channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are
- active channel writers, results may be unpredictable -
- users should make sure that all logging to the channel has
- ended before using read() with overwrite mode. Sub-buffer
- padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by
- the reader.
- sendfile() transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file
- descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed
- and will not be seen by the reader.
- poll() POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported. User applications are
- notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed.
- close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount. When the refcount
- reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the
- buffer open, the channel buffer is freed.
- In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the
- host filesystem must be mounted. For example,
- mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
- NOTE: the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel
- clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be
- mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer
- data.
- The relay interface kernel API
- ==============================
- Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients:
- TBD(curr. line MT:/API/)
- channel management functions:
- relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs,
- callbacks, private_data)
- relay_close(chan)
- relay_flush(chan)
- relay_reset(chan)
- channel management typically called on instigation of userspace:
- relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed)
- write functions:
- relay_write(chan, data, length)
- __relay_write(chan, data, length)
- relay_reserve(chan, length)
- callbacks:
- subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding)
- buf_mapped(buf, filp)
- buf_unmapped(buf, filp)
- create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global)
- remove_buf_file(dentry)
- helper functions:
- relay_buf_full(buf)
- subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length)
- Creating a channel
- ------------------
- relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu
- channel buffers. Each channel buffer will have an associated file
- created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or
- read from in user space. The files are named basename0...basenameN-1
- where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created
- in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL). If you
- want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should
- create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function,
- e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to
- relay_open(). Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory
- structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host
- filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that,
- e.g. debugfs_remove().
- In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files
- associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions
- for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file().
- create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from
- relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used
- to represent the corresponding channel buffer. The callback should
- return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer.
- remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting
- the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during
- relay_close().
- Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case
- using debugfs:
- /*
- * create_buf_file() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs.
- */
- static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename,
- struct dentry *parent,
- int mode,
- struct rchan_buf *buf,
- int *is_global)
- {
- return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf,
- &relay_file_operations);
- }
- /*
- * remove_buf_file() callback. Removes relay file from debugfs.
- */
- static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry)
- {
- debugfs_remove(dentry);
- return 0;
- }
- /*
- * relay interface callbacks
- */
- static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks =
- {
- .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler,
- .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler,
- };
- And an example relay_open() invocation using them:
- chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL);
- If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel
- creation and thus relay_open() will fail.
- The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the
- number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open().
- The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of
- double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to
- easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can
- be important for some high-volume applications. The number and size
- of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for
- the same application, different conditions will warrant different
- values for these parameters at different times. Typically, the right
- values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general,
- though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad
- idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events
- depending on the channel mode being used.
- The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way
- as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the
- default per-cpu set. This can be useful for applications interested
- mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without
- the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of
- merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step.
- To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file()
- implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a
- non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to
- represent the single buffer. In the case of a global buffer,
- create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once. The
- normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be
- used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global
- buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure
- they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping
- writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and
- creating a local version that internally does the proper locking.
- The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate
- user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available
- (including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or
- buf->chan->private_data.
- Buffer-only channels
- --------------------
- These channels have no files associated and can be created with
- relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such
- as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these
- cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call
- relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files,
- to expose the buffered data to the userspace.
- Channel 'modes'
- ---------------
- relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or
- 'no-overwrite'. The mode is entirely determined by the implementation
- of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below. The default if no
- subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode. If the
- default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read()
- interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this
- section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations.
- In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes
- continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will
- unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually
- been consumed. In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will
- be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total
- number of sub-buffers in the channel. It should be clear that if
- there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast
- enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is
- whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer.
- As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more
- per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer
- subdivided into one or more sub-buffers. Messages are written into
- the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the
- write functions described below. Whenever a message can't fit into
- the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the
- client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a
- new sub-buffer is about to occur. The client uses this callback to 1)
- initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous
- sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating
- whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer.
- To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide
- an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the
- following:
- static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
- void *subbuf,
- void *prev_subbuf,
- unsigned int prev_padding)
- {
- if (prev_subbuf)
- *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
- if (relay_buf_full(buf))
- return 0;
- subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
- return 1;
- }
- If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed,
- the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not
- occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the
- current set of ready sub-buffers. For the relay_buf_full() function
- to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay
- interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via
- relay_subbufs_consumed(). Any subsequent attempts to write into the
- buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same
- parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the
- ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the
- buffer switch can continue.
- The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode
- would be very similar:
- static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
- void *subbuf,
- void *prev_subbuf,
- unsigned int prev_padding)
- {
- if (prev_subbuf)
- *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
- subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
- return 1;
- }
- In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the
- callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur
- unconditionally. It's also meaningless for the client to use the
- relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never
- consulted.
- The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't
- define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback,
- implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does
- nothing but return 0.
- Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer
- by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the
- subbuf_start() callback. This reserved area can be used to store
- whatever information the client wants. In the example above, room is
- reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that
- sub-buffer. This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the
- subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous
- sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a
- pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't
- known until a sub-buffer is filled. The subbuf_start() callback is
- also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to
- give the client a chance to reserve space in it. In this case the
- previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so
- the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before
- writing into the previous sub-buffer.
- Writing to a channel
- --------------------
- Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using
- relay_write() or __relay_write(). relay_write() is the main logging
- function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be
- used if you might be logging from interrupt context. If you know
- you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use
- __relay_write(), which only disables preemption. These functions
- don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they
- failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return
- value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed
- unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in
- which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start()
- callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function.
- relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which
- can be written to later. This would typically be used in applications
- that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to
- stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand. Because the actual write
- may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications
- using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually
- written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as
- a separate array. See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball
- at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be
- done. Because the write is under control of the client and is
- separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer
- at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate
- synchronization when using relay_reserve().
- Closing a channel
- -----------------
- The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel.
- The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no
- longer any references to any of the channel buffers. relay_flush()
- forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used
- to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is
- closed.
- Misc
- ----
- Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it
- rather than open and close a new channel for each use. relay_reset()
- can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial
- state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying
- existing mappings. It should however only be called when it's safe to
- do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to.
- Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for
- different purposes. buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer
- is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's
- unmapped. The client can use this notification to trigger actions
- within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to
- the channel.
- Resources
- =========
- For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage:
- http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
- Credits
- =======
- The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of
- discussions on tracing involving the following:
- Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>
- Richard Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>
- Bob Wisniewski <bob@watson.ibm.com>
- Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
- Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
- Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug
- reports.
|